On Fri, 2012-10-26 at 15:10 -0400, David Miller wrote: > From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2012 15:01:53 -0400 (EDT) > > > From: Shuah Khan <shuah.khan@xxxxxx> > > Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2012 10:13:09 -0600 > > > >> Add support for debug_dma_mapping_error() call to avoid warning from > >> debug_dma_unmap() interface when it checks for mapping error checked > >> status. Without this patch, device driver failed to check map error > >> warning is generated. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <shuah.khan@xxxxxx> > > > > Why are you resending this? > > > > When you resend patches, you have to give a reason. Did the patch > > change? Are you updating the CC: list of the patch posting? Are > > you correcting something else? > > In fact you sent this _3_ times. Please, don't do this, or at least > explain why you are reposting something each time. I am really sorry for the noise. I forgot to mark this explicitly for linux-next the first time and this patch depends on a patch that went into linux-next. I sent a few patches for several architectures and lost track. I meant to add explanation before I hit send. The reason for resend is to tag it for linux-next. -- Shuah -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe sparclinux" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html