Re: sparc32: some more testing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jun 04, 2012 at 10:09:42PM +0200, Marcel van Nies wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I forgot to attach the patch to revert commit
> 4d14a459857bd151ecbd14bcd37b4628da00792b.

Just a random guess...
Try to drop the tsunami special blockops to see 
if that has any effect.

Just comment out this line:

	hypersparc_setup_blockops();

in srmmu.c

That function replaces a few functions in lib/blockops
with hypersparc optimized versions.

I assume the effect is none - but it could be good to know.
Next step would be to try to be less optimal in the various flush
functions - but I do not yet feel comfortable enough to provide
you with a patch to do this.

I had something cooked up myself that just did flush_all for all
of the operations. But this was not the issue here so I dunno if
that has any effect or if it worked at all.

	Sam
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe sparclinux" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [DCCP]     [Linux ARM Development]     [Linux]     [Photo]     [Yosemite Help]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux x86_64]     [Linux Hams]

  Powered by Linux