Re: [PATCH] sparc32: drop unused btfixup features

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 13 May 2012 17:14:28 +0200

> On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 01:20:21PM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
>> >From d855682558cd176f326bf07e705331d72040083e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Date: Sun, 13 May 2012 13:17:16 +0200
>> Subject: [PATCH] sparc32: drop unused btfixup features
>> 
>> We no longer use any of the const replacement features.
>> Also drop the support code in btfixupprep
>> 
>> Boot tested up+smp on my ss5.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> I have started to look a bit more into the btfixup stuff.
> And I am a bit confused of what I see.
> The content on btfixup.S does not match my expectations.
> 
> I am right now not sure if I broke it somehow by this patch,
> so please do not apply!
> 
> Will take a closer look during next week and respin.

I say hold off on this, we have completely eliminating btfixup
in our sights now.

Let's blow away the remaining references and then kill btfixup off
completely with one final stroke.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe sparclinux" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [DCCP]     [Linux ARM Development]     [Linux]     [Photo]     [Yosemite Help]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux x86_64]     [Linux Hams]

  Powered by Linux