* Sam Ravnborg <sam@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 11:13:52AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > * Sam Ravnborg <sam@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 12:46:34PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > > On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 12:24 PM, David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > With special guest sparc64 assembler hacker, Paul E. McKenney. > > > > > > > > Oh christ. You're teaching *more* people about sparc64? > > > You do not get it... > > > > > > How many people are pondering around tweaking every bit of x86 > > > specific code? A lot! Let them have fun competing :-) > > > > I wish it was so! In reality there's really just a handful of > > people looking at actual x86 assembly code. I don't know whether > > I've ever seen a conflict between substantial x86 assembly > > patches, in the last 4 years since I co-maintain the x86 > > architecture ... > > Hmm... > > lines of c files lines of S files > x86 183609 27130 > sparc 66823 25852 Yes. ( I have no idea what the 'Hmm...' means - do those numbers somehow contradict what I said? ) > There is more than just assembly when dealign with an architecture. Definitely. Thanks, Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe sparclinux" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
