From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 12:46:34 -0700 > On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 12:24 PM, David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> With special guest sparc64 assembler hacker, Paul E. McKenney. > > Oh christ. You're teaching *more* people about sparc64? > > Where will it end? :-) > That said, Looking at the patch, it looks a bit dubious. Why does the > > cmp %l1, 0 > > instruction remain, even if the conditional branch was deleted? I'm > not seeing any subsequent uses of %icc, but hey, I'm no sparc expert > (nor do I want to be). It's unnecessary but harmless, I'll sweep it up in the sparc-next tree when I get a chace. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe sparclinux" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
