On Wed, 7 Mar 2012, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: > On 13:50 Wed 07 Mar , Nicolas Pitre wrote: > > On Wed, 7 Mar 2012, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: > > > > > On 17:30 Tue 06 Mar , Stephen Warren wrote: > > > > This allows the user to use U-Boot's mkimage's -T kernel_noload option > > > > if their arch Kconfig allows it, and they desire. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > --- > > > > The next patch enables this new CONFIG_ALLOW_ option for ARM. I assume > > > > that some other architectures will also be able to enable it, but I'm > > > > not familiar enough with any to know which. > > > I'm going to repeat. I don't think any impromevent here. > > > > You know what? I agree with you... on a conceptual level only though. > > > > In reality, some people are are just too used to it, either for > > emotional reasons or simply because that's what was there before so they > > simply perpetuated it without thinking further, or whatever. REmoving > > that support would just upset a lot of people. And frankly we have > > better things to do than starting a flamewar over this. > My concern is this new feature is available on new version of U-Boot only > and people that does not have it and built the uImage are going to ask the > question. Why bla bla bla.... > > Where people are supposed to RTFM > > I do do not want to have the answer this and manage this. Well, just don't then. Nicolas -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe sparclinux" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
