On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 5:58 PM, David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> The reason the test is only in this specific spot, is that's the only
> place where the optimization makes any sense.
Well, considering that it didn't make any sense there *either*, that's
kind of pointless.
We always had the unconditional "set_fs()" in the exec path. It only
got moved, and as part of that conscious effort, the pointless
architecture churn is getting cleaned up.
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe sparclinux" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
