David Miller wrote:
From: Daniel Hellstrom <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 20 May 2011 16:22:33 +0200
I agree that it is a better solution in that case and in other cases
too. The problem will be for me to write a PCI Library in the limited
context of the PROM, it is much more complex that writing a PCI host
driver. The non-free PCI specification alone is heavy, compatibility
between PCI revisions and then there is the bridge
specification... ugg, I will probably have to leave that to the next
generation :)
I guess if it's really that bad we can merge your PCI changes for
now, please resubmit them.
Thanks, it means a lot to us.
Julian:
When I looked at this earlier, I was thinking that we might want to
introduce a new KConfig variable, maybe CONFIG_LEON_PCI, to hide all
this stuff behind so we don't have to do any complicated ifdefery or
change any existing ifdefs.
I will add a PCIC and a LEON_PCI Kconfig option that depends on
!LEON/LEON and PCI, as julian/sam suggests. I'm busy at the moment with
other stuff it a pity these problem wasn't brought forward until now, is
the merge window open until the end of the week?
Thanks,
Daniel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe sparclinux" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
