>From 875da4871c4654390d41aa110480211ccbd2aac2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Sat, 21 May 2011 22:59:19 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 2/2] sparc32: fix build, move inline function to .c file Fix following build eroor: CC arch/sparc/kernel/irq_32.o In file included from arch/sparc/include/asm/smp.h:6:0, from arch/sparc/include/asm/system_32.h:12, from arch/sparc/include/asm/system.h:6, from arch/sparc/include/asm/ptrace.h:235, from arch/sparc/include/asm/thread_info_32.h:19, from sparc/include/asm/thread_info.h:6, from include/linux/thread_info.h:53, from include/linux/preempt.h:9, from include/linux/smp.h:34, from include/linux/kernel_stat.h:4, from arch/sparc/kernel/irq_32.c:14: arch/sparc/include/asm/smp_32.h:82:19: error: static declaration of 'smp_call_function_single' follows non-static declaration include/linux/smp.h:29:5: note: previous declaration of 'smp_call_function_single' was here Bug is likely triggered by changes in include files. The fix was obviously correct so I found no value in tracking down the offending commit. Signed-off-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@xxxxxxxxxxxx> --- arch/sparc/include/asm/smp_32.h | 8 -------- arch/sparc/kernel/smp_32.c | 8 ++++++++ 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/sparc/include/asm/smp_32.h b/arch/sparc/include/asm/smp_32.h index d82d7f4..4b905ab 100644 --- a/arch/sparc/include/asm/smp_32.h +++ b/arch/sparc/include/asm/smp_32.h @@ -79,14 +79,6 @@ static inline int smp_call_function(void (*func)(void *info), void *info, int wa return 0; } -static inline int smp_call_function_single(int cpuid, void (*func) (void *info), - void *info, int wait) -{ - smp_cross_call((smpfunc_t)func, cpumask_of_cpu(cpuid), - (unsigned long) info, 0, 0, 0); - return 0; -} - static inline int cpu_logical_map(int cpu) { return cpu; diff --git a/arch/sparc/kernel/smp_32.c b/arch/sparc/kernel/smp_32.c index 442286d..d677327 100644 --- a/arch/sparc/kernel/smp_32.c +++ b/arch/sparc/kernel/smp_32.c @@ -235,6 +235,14 @@ void smp_reschedule_irq(void) set_need_resched(); } +inline int smp_call_function_single(int cpuid, void (*func) (void *info), + void *info, int wait) +{ + smp_cross_call((smpfunc_t)func, cpumask_of_cpu(cpuid), + (unsigned long) info, 0, 0, 0); + return 0; +} + void smp_flush_page_to_ram(unsigned long page) { /* Current theory is that those who call this are the one's -- 1.6.0.6 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe sparclinux" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html