Re: [PATCH]SPARC32: Fixed unaligned memory copying in function __csum_partial_copy_sparc_generic

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



11.05.11, 00:28, "David Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>:

>I don't understand why you're testing "andcc %o3, %o0, %g0", as %o3 has
>the value computed in "srl %g1, 1, %o3" here.

>What is so interesting about "ptr & (length >> 1)"?

1)Label ccte (rather, cc_end_cruft) copies data sequentially by pieces of length 2^x bytes from biggest to smallest. For example, if %g1 is 15, then the label copies 8+4+2+1=15, and %o0 must be aligned to 8.

Let alignment a = 2^x. Pointer ptr % a == 0 when:
ptr & (a >> 1) == 0
ptr & (a >> 2) == 0
..

Or, what is the same:
ptr & (length >> 1) == 0
ptr & (length >> 2) == 0
..

I.e. we are looking for right alignment, if another case don't call ccte.

2)We check %o0 only, because %o1 has the same last two bits, and cc_end_cruft writes 4 bytes or less.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe sparclinux" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [DCCP]     [Linux ARM Development]     [Linux]     [Photo]     [Yosemite Help]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux x86_64]     [Linux Hams]

  Powered by Linux