From: Daniel Hellstrom <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2011 09:50:05 +0100 > David Miller wrote: > >>Ok, this looks mostly fine to me. >> >>Once we have the sun4m/sun4d versions written I can think about >>applying this. >> >>We might want to abstract out the common code of the dispatch and >>service stuff you have for LEON, otherwise we'll have 3 copies of >>that code that sets and clears the mask state. >> >>Perhaps something using BTFIXUP or similar. >> > I was thinking so too, BTFIXUPs for CPU model specific "IPI > operations" to avoid the switch-statement in the arch_ functions. Exactly. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe sparclinux" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html