Re: Bug#609371: linux-image-2.6.37-trunk-sparc64: module scsi_mod: Unknown relocation: 36

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> 
> I still wonder how a 32-bit system can generate an unaligned access trap for an
> access to a 64-bit variable aligned on 32-bit, given that there is, by
> definition, no 64-bit memory accesses available on the architecture ?

>From the SPARC V8 manual (this is the 32 bit version of SPARC):

    Load/Store Instructions

    ...
    Integer load and store instructions support byte (8-bit), halfword (16-bit), word
    (32-bit), and doubleword (64-bit) accesses.
    ...

    Alignment Restrictions

    Halfword accesses must be aligned on a 2-byte boundary, word accesses (which
    include instruction fetches) must be aligned on a 4-byte boundary, and doubleword
    accesses must be aligned on an 8-byte boundary. An improperly aligned
    address causes a load or store instruction to generate a mem_address_not_aligned
    trap.


	Sam
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe sparclinux" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [DCCP]     [Linux ARM Development]     [Linux]     [Photo]     [Yosemite Help]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux x86_64]     [Linux Hams]

  Powered by Linux