On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 17:04, Sam Ravnborg <sam@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 02:31:13PM -0800, David Miller wrote: >> From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@xxxxxxxxxxxx> >> Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2011 22:02:17 +0100 >> >> > Kristoffer Glembo noticed that SBUS is always defined for SPARC. >> > So I went out and dropped all #ifdef SBUS that were >> > present in SPARC only code. >> > >> > This touches: >> > - arch/sparc >> > - drivers/net >> > - sound/sparc >> > >> > But despite this I expect we can add all this to sparc.git. >> > If you prefer I can submit the patches via the usual channels. >> > >> > Build tested on sparc64 & sparc. >> > >> > Patches are on top of sparc-next as of yesterday. >> >> I've decided I'm going to defer on this set of patches for now. >> >> The real thing to do is to create a include/linux/sbus.h that >> provides the SBUS specific interfaces, and dummy ones when >> CONFIG_SBUS is not defined. >> >> That way all of the sparc drivers can be enabled unconditionally >> as long as CONFIG_OF is true. > > OK. > I will try to look into providing this an resend. I'm thinking about having a look to see if it's possible to split the sBus code out of the base sparc arch code this weekend. I'm thinking of trying to put it behind a KConfig option, similar to PCI - of course making it properly backwards compatible so that nothing breaks horribly. I'll hold off on sending anything until you've re-sent this. Thanks, -- Julian Calaby Email: julian.calaby@xxxxxxxxx Profile: http://www.google.com/profiles/julian.calaby/ .Plan: http://sites.google.com/site/juliancalaby/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe sparclinux" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
