On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 04:41, David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > From: Julian Calaby <julian.calaby@xxxxxxxxx> > Date: Sat, 04 Dec 2010 14:55:24 +1100 > >> After having a good poke around in the patches you sent to address >> the PROM call regressions, I saw a few places where some files could >> be cleaned up and dropped. >> >> These haven't even been compile tested as I currently lack the >> equipment - hence the RFC tags, however they're a few obvious >> changes and moving some code so they *should* be safe. ..... er >> scratch that. Test them, please? > > Thanks Julian, I'll look into reviewing and integrating these changes > soon. No problem! In the interests of clarity, I was planning to add a patch to do the rename in #5 before doing the merge - and, once you'd pushed your patch set out somewhere, I was planning to re-post all this as actual patches, now that they're known to work. (thanks Adrien) How would you like me to proceed? / How can I make your life easier? Thanks, -- Julian Calaby Email: julian.calaby@xxxxxxxxx Profile: http://www.google.com/profiles/julian.calaby/ .Plan: http://sites.google.com/site/juliancalaby/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe sparclinux" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
