On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 20:42, Adrien Mazarguil <maz@xxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sat, Dec 04, 2010 at 02:55:24PM +1100, Julian Calaby wrote: >> After having a good poke around in the patches you sent to address the >> PROM call regressions, I saw a few places where some files could be >> cleaned up and dropped. >> >> These haven't even been compile tested as I currently lack the equipment - >> hence the RFC tags, however they're a few obvious changes and moving some >> code so they *should* be safe. ..... er scratch that. Test them, please? > > I've tested your patches, I confirm they compile cleanly and work fine for > me. Thanks very much! -- Julian Calaby Email: julian.calaby@xxxxxxxxx Profile: http://www.google.com/profiles/julian.calaby/ .Plan: http://sites.google.com/site/juliancalaby/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe sparclinux" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
