On Sun, 10 Oct 2010 22:04:43 -0600 Grant Likely <grant.likely@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 02:09:05AM -0700, Andres Salomon wrote: > > Whoops, that should've been 1/5, not 1/7. Two additional x86 > > patches snuck in there that are already in Grant's test-devicetree > > branch. > > Note that of the two patches I'm carrying in test-devicetree, only one > of them is actually able to move into linux-next at this present time. > > 1) of/irq: remove references to NO_IRQ in drivers/of/platform.c > > I'm putting this one into next-devicetree now > > 2) x86/of: define irq functions to allow drivers/of/* to build on x86 > > I've not yet received an ack from the x86 maintainers on this, so I > cannot put it into my next branch. (Sorry I didn't notice this > earlier; it just dawned on me as I was looking over which patches I > needed to move over). The same goes for the patch that actaully adds > OF support for x86 OLPC. I'll need an ack from x86 folks before I > merge it. > > g. Okay. For reference, that patch is: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/168662/ x86 folks, mind reviewing and providing an Ack or Nack? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe sparclinux" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
