From: Grant Likely <grant.likely@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2010 11:36:50 -0600 > Weird. Yeah, no other platforms expect to get a phandle type > definition from the kernel headers. The only thing driving this > conversation is from arch/sparc/include/asm/Kbuild: > > header-y += openprom.h It was probably at one point for the sake of asm/openpromio.h but that header has no dependencies on openprom.h The only hit I can find in google code search, for non-kernel code, is the SILO bootloader. But that tree includes it's own copy of include/asm/openprom.h so the actual kernel copy isn't even used. I'd say we can stop exporting that header and also therefore not worry about making phandle_t visible to userspace. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe sparclinux" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
