Re: [GIT] Sparc

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 11:53 AM, Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Um, no.  You've *already* called get_signal_to_deliver().  There had been
> no SIGSEGV in sight.  You happily went on to set a sigframe for e.g.
> SIGHUP, but ran out of stack.  At that point you get force_sigsegv()
> from handle_signal().  _NOW_ you have a pending SIGSEGV

Ahh. Ok. Different case from the one I thought you were worried about.
And yeah, I guess that one does require us to mess with the low-level
asm code (although I do wonder if we could not make the whole
do_notify_resume + reschedule code be generic C code - it's a lot of
duplicated subtle asm as it is).

                   Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe sparclinux" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [DCCP]     [Linux ARM Development]     [Linux]     [Photo]     [Yosemite Help]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux x86_64]     [Linux Hams]

  Powered by Linux