From: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2010 09:42:55 -0400 (EDT) >> #define BACKOFF_SETUP(reg) >> -#define BACKOFF_SPIN(reg, tmp, label) \ >> - ba,pt %xcc, label; \ >> - nop; > > I'm just curious, is there some good reason to place nop in the delay slot > instead of the anul bit? --- i.e. some inefficiency or bugs? It's definitely slower on pre-Niagara cpus. > BTW, I found a missing delay slot. Good catch, I'll apply this, thanks! -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe sparclinux" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
