On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 03:34:01PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Tuesday 27 July 2010, Grant Likely wrote: > > > I suggest to go back to v2 of your patch where you use asm-generic/of.h. > > > > Stephen suggested dropping asm-generic/of.h. I'm happy to do it either way. > > I don't mind adding stuff to asm-generic, but I think in this case it would > be easier to keep this in linux/of.h because there is nothing wrong with > all architectures including it. > > Most files in asm-generic are there only for historical reasons, where some > architectures use them but others don't. IMHO we should use the include/linux > headers preferred for new stuff though. Hi Arnd. Thanks for this explanation. Obviously my previous post about asm-generic was wrong (as Grant already indicated). Sam -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe sparclinux" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
