On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 7:38 PM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi Stephen, > > On Mon, 28 Jun 2010 10:57:33 -0700 Stephen Neuendorffer <stephen.neuendorffer@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> 2) config OF is currently implemented in the architecture code. This >> should be non-architecture dependent and selected by the arches that >> need it. >> >> Comments greatly appreciated, in particular if you have >> likely-to-be-easy-to-get-accepted suggestions for 3), or feel like >> carefully solving 2) in >> a way which doesn't bork the existing of-based arches. > > See the following patch set. Parts 1, 2 and 3 could be applied to the > respective architecture trees as well as Grant's tree to aleviate some > conflict problems. Part 5 could wait until a later time if necessary. > However, this is relatively trivial, so we could just collect ACKs and > put it all in Grant's tree and live with any minor pain. > > Having OF in more than one Kconfig file should not cause any problems as > long as they are all the same. I've got an Ack from David now. I'll wait for more acks, and then pull the whole series of 5 into my devicetree-next branch. It's certainly less invasive that some of the other changes arch changes I've taken through my tree. g. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe sparclinux" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
