Hi Grant,
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 09:22:50AM -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
> Both dev_archdata.of_node and of_device.node are duplications of the
> device.of_node value. This patch removes them.
Yeah, they're plain duplications since you introduced dev.of_node.
I wonder what was the problem with using dev.archdata.of_node?
Why dev.of_node is better?
Also, by using dev.of_node directly you have to introduce ugly
#ifdefs in the non-OF code (as in i2c patch), which you don't
need with transparent archdata and accessors, which you've just
removed:
> -static inline void dev_archdata_set_node(struct dev_archdata *ad,
> - struct device_node *np)
> -{
> - ad->of_node = np;
> -}
> -
> -static inline struct device_node *
> -dev_archdata_get_node(const struct dev_archdata *ad)
> -{
> - return ad->of_node;
> -}
Thanks,
--
Anton Vorontsov
email: cbouatmailru@xxxxxxxxx
irc://irc.freenode.net/bd2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe sparclinux" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
