Re: [PATCH 3/9] of: protect linux/of.h with CONFIG_OF

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 11:10 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt
<benh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-02-13 at 09:02 -0700, Grant Likely wrote:
>> From: Jeremy Kerr <jeremy.kerr@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> For platforms that have CONFIG_OF optional, we need to make the contents
>> of linux/of.h conditional on CONFIG_OF.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jeremy Kerr <jeremy.kerr@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Acked-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> For now...
>
> In the long run, maybe we want some of the iterators to be empty inlines
> returning NULL ?

Yes.  I'll add them as they are needed.

g.

-- 
Grant Likely, B.Sc., P.Eng.
Secret Lab Technologies Ltd.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe sparclinux" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [DCCP]     [Linux ARM Development]     [Linux]     [Photo]     [Yosemite Help]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux x86_64]     [Linux Hams]

  Powered by Linux