From: Kristoffer Glembo <kristoffer@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2010 11:35:59 +0100 > I was using CONFIG_SLAB without noticing any problems. > > But I'm a bit confused. Doesn't this patch generate the exact same code? > Now __pa will add in phys_base but pfn_to_page(__pa()>>PAGE_SHIFT) > will remove it by subtracting ARCH_PFN_OFFSET. ... > For me it still fails if I'm not adding phys_base in page_to_phys. Indeed. Ok, let me think about this some more. Thanks for testing and looking at this. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe sparclinux" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
