On Sunday 2010-01-10 22:11, David Miller wrote: > >> libc6 2.10.2-4 > >Perfect, now you just have to audit what changed between the -2 and >the -4 package to find the bug :-) I really do not believe you when you say your glibc is not affected. Maybe some things did not became clear as part of the discussion, so let me quickly restate: - talking about -m64 / libc6-sparc64_2.10.2-*_sparc.deb only - syscall is screwed up. strace outputs: C func | i386 | x86_64 | sparc32 | sparc64 --------+-----------+------------+-----------+--------------- stat | stat64 | stat | stat64 | stat64 lstat | lstat64 | lstat | lstat64 | lstat64 fstatat | fstatat64 | newfstatat | fstatat64 | fstatat64 fstat | fstat64 | fstat | fstat64 | fstat (*) - I now found and fixed the problem, here is the patch for you to study (as code speaks louder) Index: glibc-2.10.1/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/sparc/sparc64/fxstat.c =================================================================== --- glibc-2.10.1.orig/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/sparc/sparc64/fxstat.c +++ glibc-2.10.1/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/sparc/sparc64/fxstat.c @@ -1 +1 @@ -#include "../../fxstat.c" +#include "../../i386/fxstat.c" (Hint: Compare with sparc64/lxstat.c) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe sparclinux" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
