`>>' has a higher precedence than `?' so src2 evaluated to
either 16 or 0 dependent on the bits set in rs2.
Signed-off-by: Roel Kluin <roel.kluin@xxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/sparc/kernel/visemul.c | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
I am not 100% sure that the code was incorrect, however, if it
was intended I think it is a very strange way to write it.
Roel
diff --git a/arch/sparc/kernel/visemul.c b/arch/sparc/kernel/visemul.c
index b956fd7..d231cbd 100644
--- a/arch/sparc/kernel/visemul.c
+++ b/arch/sparc/kernel/visemul.c
@@ -617,7 +617,7 @@ static void pmul(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned int insn, unsigned int opf)
rs2 = fps_regval(f, RS2(insn));
rd_val = 0;
- src2 = (rs2 >> (opf == FMUL8x16AU_OPF) ? 16 : 0);
+ src2 = rs2 >> (opf == FMUL8x16AU_OPF ? 16 : 0);
for (byte = 0; byte < 4; byte++) {
u16 src1 = (rs1 >> (byte * 8)) & 0x00ff;
u32 prod = src1 * src2;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe sparclinux" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
