From: Kristoffer Glembo <kristoffer@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 04 Nov 2009 16:50:36 +0100 > Yeah I know. The leon3_dma_ops are copied from the pci32_dma_ops. > I think only unmap_page was added basically. Why is there no > pci32_unmap_page by the way? Maybe I can just add that and use > them as is. Basically because they are buggy and don't get much usage. They are the worst thing to use as a model for your purposes since that code gets the least amount of testing, the SBUS ones on the other hand get pretty much all of the sparc32 testing. > The SBUS routines look quite different though. I will use the > pci32_dma_ops. I suggested the SBUS ones because they inherit the OpenFirmware device node name into the resource. They have also been cleaned up substantially, the PCI ones are very messy still. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe sparclinux" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
