Hi, > arch/sparc/kernel/built-in.o: In function `leon_node_init': > (.init.text+0x29c4): undefined reference to `_amba_init' I posted the patchset version 6 (see mailing list). This time _amba_init() is not called directly. I had to use another aproach than the XXX_initcall() aproach that Thomas Boegendoerfer suggested: leon_node_init() is called too early in the boot process (main()->setup_arch()->paging_init()->prom_build_devicetree()..) and as far as I understand it there is no xxx_initcall() that gets called that early => therefore I used a callback instead: ... void __initdata (*prom_amba_init)(struct device_node *dp, struct device_node ***nextp) = 0; ... if (prom_amba_init && ... prom_amba_init(dp, nextp); } ... The callback will be initialized by the _bootloader_. > When you fix this up and repost the series, do me another favor, try > to build the kernel successfully after each and every patch. With > LEON enabled, the tree does not build after patch #3 because srmmu.c > doesn't include asm/leon.h yet and thus srmmu_swprobe() isn't declared. I didnt really undestand this one: The patch is split up in 5 subpatches that should logically divide the big patch. There guess are dependencies among the subpatches. The only way I can think of is to send all 5 subpatches as one big patch. Is it ok with the version 6 patches that I just sent on the mailing list anyway? (that is 5 subpatches)? -- Greetings Konrad -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe sparclinux" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
