* David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > From: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 11:53:09 +0900 > > > This is the repost of the patchset (as Ingo asked me offline) : > > > > http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/7/13/20 > > > > There is no functional change. I just added David's ack to #3-8 > > patches and Robert's Tested-by to #8 patch. > > > > I confirmed that it can be applied cleanly to mainline, -next, and > > -tip trees. > > > > The git tree is also available: > > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tomo/linux-2.6-misc.git > > sparc > > I just made a quick build test on sparc32 and sparc64, as well as > a non-debug execution test on sparc64 and it all looks fine. > > Thanks for doing this work! > > I assume Ingo or someone else is going to merge this stuff? Yeah, it's in the tip:core/iommu tree: 451d740: sparc: Add CONFIG_DMA_API_DEBUG support ee664a9: sparc: Use asm-generic/pci-dma-compat c2c07db: sparc: Replace sbus_map_single and sbus_unmap_single with sbus_map_page and sbus_unmap_page 595cc85: sparc: Remove no-op dma_4v_sync_single_for_cpu and dma_4v_sync_sg_for_cpu 02f7a18: sparc: Use asm-generic/dma-mapping-common.h bc0a14f: sparc: Use dma_map_ops struct and pushed out to linux-next as well and present there as well. I did a cross-build test of Sparc before i pushed it out, but it would be nice if you could check the end result linux-next as well ... just in case. (whenever you get around to do it - there's no urgency.) Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe sparclinux" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
