Re: NMI watchdog + NOHZ question

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> And similarly to sparc64, if that 5+ second qla2xxx interrupt
> sequence happens after the tick_nohz_stop_sched_tick() call
> we can run into the same situation.

Yes it would be probably safer to do the tick disabling with interrupts off
already.

These days NMI watchdog is not used much on x86 anymore because it's 
default off, so probably people never noticed that.

-Andi

-- 
ak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx -- Speaking for myself only.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe sparclinux" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [DCCP]     [Linux ARM Development]     [Linux]     [Photo]     [Yosemite Help]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux x86_64]     [Linux Hams]

  Powered by Linux