From: Frans Pop <elendil@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 21:01:37 +0200 > The question is maybe: are there other devices that currently have dma > disabled because of the (old) code and would stop working with > ide_id_dma_bug() completely removed? The conservative thing to do I guess > would be to reverse 8d64fcd9. For this specific situation I would likely avoid a revert at least with how things currently stand. Right now we are not yet certain what introduced the problem. We are also not certain what might break by reverting this commit, either. There are portions of that commit other than the one changing the logic of ide_id_dma_bug(). That's a "fix" based upon two large unknowns, which is not wise I think :) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe sparclinux" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
