On Mon, May 04, 2009 at 09:40:26AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> As far as I can tell, the main issue is that nobody's actively working
> on the debian sparc port in the first place. And without active
> maintainers, that port is actually a disservice to users and the sparc
> linux community.
Even if nobody is currently volunteering to explicitly state that they are
working on the port as a whole (which has always been a fairly vague concept
anyway), the software is generally working fine (yes, even if it has bugs),
the buildds are happily churning (and are actually actively maintained),
new users do actually regularly come through, so I fail to see how it's
a disservice to everyone.
What is that statement supposed to mean, anyway? Would you prefer if
the port didn't exist at all?
--
2. That which causes joy or happiness.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe sparclinux" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
