Hello,
The percpu part looks good to me. Just one question below.
David Miller wrote:
> void __init setup_per_cpu_areas(void)
> {
> - unsigned long size, i, nr_possible_cpus = num_possible_cpus();
> - char *ptr;
> + size_t dyn_size, static_size = __per_cpu_end - __per_cpu_start;
> + static struct vm_struct vm;
> + unsigned long delta, cpu;
> + size_t pcpu_unit_size;
> + size_t ptrs_size;
> +
> + pcpur_size = PFN_ALIGN(static_size + PERCPU_MODULE_RESERVE +
> + PERCPU_DYNAMIC_RESERVE);
> + dyn_size = pcpur_size - static_size - PERCPU_MODULE_RESERVE;
Isn't it better to use embedding allocator for !NUMA cases (one less
TLB entry usage for each CPU)?
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe sparclinux" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
