Jan Kara wrote: > Hi, > > thanks for the updated disassembly. > >> 55bab0: 82 10 60 01 or %g1, 1, %g1 >> spin_unlock(&journal->j_list_lock); >> 55bab4: 40 06 4b 20 call 6ee734 <_spin_unlock> >> 55bab8: c2 24 e0 28 st %g1, [ %l3 + 0x28 ] > OK, so it really seems that: > jinode->i_flags |= JI_COMMIT_RUNNING; > spin_unlock(&journal->j_list_lock); > > has been compiled to > ld [ %l3 + 0x28 ], %g1 > or %g1, 1, %g1 > call 6ee734 <_spin_unlock> > st %g1, [ %l3 + 0x28 ] > > Which seems like a bug in the compiler or in the way implement compiler > barriers in spin_unlock() on UP sparc. Or is there some sparc magic by which > this is correct code? Any clever sparc guy? > > Honza Looks fine to me - the store is made in the branch delay slot of the call, so it will occur before the first instruction at the call target address executes. Jiri. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe sparclinux" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
