> And I guess the seccomp interaction means that this is potentially a > 2.6.29 thing. Not that I know whether anybody actually _uses_ seccomp. It > does seem to be enabled in at least Fedora kernels, but it might not be > used anywhere. I have no idea who uses it. I just assume that anyone who is using it might be expecting it to be reliable for security purposes as advertised. Thanks, Roland -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe sparclinux" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
