Re: sparc32 broke

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jan 09, 2009 at 11:35:24PM -0800, David Miller wrote:
> From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 08:33:21 +0100
> 
> > The real fix should look like this:
> > 
> > #ifdef __arch64__
> > #define _NSIG_BPW       64
> > #else
> > #define _NSIG_BPW       64
> > #endif
> > 
> > This is required because this header is exported to userspace
> > where we do not have access to CONFIG_* symbols.
> 
> I assume you meant to use "32" in the #else branch :-)
Freudian attempt or similar...

I now did a re-review of the unified signal.h.
And I could not spot any other subtle differences.

	Sam
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe sparclinux" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [DCCP]     [Linux ARM Development]     [Linux]     [Photo]     [Yosemite Help]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux x86_64]     [Linux Hams]

  Powered by Linux