Re: ftrace breaks sparc64 build

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 11:35:43AM +0000, Al Viro wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 07:53:04AM +0000, Jan Beulich wrote:
> 
> > The __crc_... reference is definitely bogus - none should survive with the
> > new .c->.o rule. Could you find out what object file they originate from?
> 
> So can you, by use of arcane tool known as "grep"...  It's in kernel/softirq.c
> and that's genksyms parser being fucked in head.  Look for TYPEOF_KEYW
> in parse.y and you'll see.  Especially amusing part is a kludge from
> commit a89a0a2354ae666612968e254d650bfd04f11eb6...

Any feedback on what to do to make it better?
Never used typeof myself so I do not know the exact syntax.

> 
> > The others look like a tools side behavioral difference, as I never saw any
> > such. Is this problem sparc32-specific (I tested x86 and ia64 only)? What's
> > the binutils version used?
> 
> 2.18.50.0.6.
> 
> And no, it's not tools side.  What it is, AFAICT, is that sparc32 has
> LDFLAGS_vmlinux = -r, which leaves a metric arseload of relocs that
> wouldn't have survived into vmlinux otherwise.  Look at .rela__ksymtab
> in .tmp_vmlinux1, for example...

The use of -r is to support the btfixup magic.
I have been thinking of moving the btfixup phase so it happens _before_
the final link of vmlinux. This should help us here.

But I never managed to really understand what the btfixup thing is all
about and has then been sidetracked by funnier stuff.

	Sam


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe sparclinux" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [DCCP]     [Linux ARM Development]     [Linux]     [Photo]     [Yosemite Help]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux x86_64]     [Linux Hams]

  Powered by Linux