Re: ftrace breaks sparc64 build

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jan 05, 2009 at 11:30:58PM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Jan 2009, Heiko Carstens wrote:
> Sam and Heiko,
> 
> I'm trying to see if the (a ? b : c) construct is causing the issue. Can 
> you test this patch.
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/compiler.h b/include/linux/compiler.h
> index d95da10..e13ad24 100644
> --- a/include/linux/compiler.h
> +++ b/include/linux/compiler.h
> @@ -113,7 +113,8 @@ void ftrace_likely_update(struct ftrace_branch_data *f, int val, int expect);
>   * "Define 'is'", Bill Clinton
>   * "Define 'if'", Steven Rostedt
>   */
> -#define if(cond) if (__builtin_constant_p((cond)) ? !!(cond) :		\
> +#define if(cond) if ((__builtin_constant_p((cond)) && !!(cond)) ||	\
> +		     (!__builtin_constant_p((cond)) &&			\

Doesn't help unfortunately.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe sparclinux" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [DCCP]     [Linux ARM Development]     [Linux]     [Photo]     [Yosemite Help]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux x86_64]     [Linux Hams]

  Powered by Linux