On Sat, Dec 27, 2008 at 08:03:05AM +0100, Sam Ravnborg wrote: > On Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 03:33:50PM -0800, David Miller wrote: > > From: Kyle McMartin <kyle@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2008 15:45:01 -0500 > > > > > On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 09:40:54PM +0100, Sam Ravnborg wrote: > > > > Use a dedicated aligned section for the init_thread_union > > > > variable and declare this section in vmlinux.lds. > > > > > > > > This align sparc with most other architectures. > > > > Eventually this allow the init_task bits to be unified across all architectures. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Cc: Kyle McMartin <kyle@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > I'm working on v2 of my init_task patchset, I'll try to post it to > > > linux-arch this evening or Monday. > > > > Is this patch from Sam going into Kyle's patch set or should > > I apply it directly to sparc-next-2.6? > > > > Just let me know... > I suggest that you take it via sparc-next-2.6. > > With your usual track schedule you will soon have this > merged and Kyle can rebase on top of linus' tree. Aye, with the coming sparc merge this is the sensible option. :) cheers, Kyle -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe sparclinux" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
