Re: [PATCH] use sparc64 version of prom/printf.c

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Dec 07, 2008 at 08:19:21PM +0100, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> Hi Robert.
> 
> On Sun, Dec 07, 2008 at 01:29:42PM -0500, Robert Reif wrote:
> > Use sparc64 version of prom/printf.c.
> > 
> > The only differences for sparc32 is that prom_printf is no longer 
> > exported for modules which should be OK.
> 
> cyber200fb uses prom_prinf and can be built as a module.
> >From Kconfig:
> 
> config FB_CYBER2000
>         tristate "CyberPro 2000/2010/5000 support"
>         depends on FB && PCI && (BROKEN || !SPARC64)
> 
> So it looks to me we should keep the EXPORT.

And a test bult with your patch confirmed this:
  MODPOST 5 modules
ERROR: "prom_printf" [drivers/video/cyber2000fb.ko] undefined!
make[2]: *** [__modpost] Error 1
make[1]: *** [modules] Error 2

Please redo your patch with the EXPORT kept.
I cannot see that it hurts sparc64 so no need to do it conditionally.

	Sam
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe sparclinux" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [DCCP]     [Linux ARM Development]     [Linux]     [Photo]     [Yosemite Help]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux x86_64]     [Linux Hams]

  Powered by Linux