Re: KVM for Sparc?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 9/24/08, David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> From: "Blue Swirl" <blauwirbel@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2008 21:06:21 +0300
>
>
>  > Now I found the relevant part in the manuals. The extra sun4v bit is
>  > not taken into account from user mode, so we can't catch privileged to
>  > hyperprivileged mode traps easily.
>
>
> That's right, the top bit is ignored in user mode.

The hypervisor uses traps 0x80, 0x83, 0x84, 0x85, and 0xff. Looking at
how these alias to low number traps: first four are unused or used for
resets (SIR, RED, XIR), so they are not in the fast path. 0xff aliases
to 0x7f, which is part of Fill 7 otherwin trap. Maybe that is not
performance critical? The Fill 7 trap entry could be shortened with
off-table jumps.

I'm thinking that we could disassemble the calling instruction on
entry to the lower traps and detect what was the true cause of the
trap.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe sparclinux" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [DCCP]     [Linux ARM Development]     [Linux]     [Photo]     [Yosemite Help]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux x86_64]     [Linux Hams]

  Powered by Linux