Re: [BUG] 2.6.26-rc1 lost half the RAM on UltraSPARC 5

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Sep 05, 2008 at 07:43:12PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 08:43:10PM +0200, Mikael Pettersson wrote:
> > Thanks Dave. As the dmesg diff below shows, this patch fixed
> > my lost RAM issue. I actually have about 8KB more available
> > now than I had with 2.6.25.
> [...]
> > +Memory: 245448k available (1920k kernel code, 744k data, 152k init) [fffff80000000000,0000000017f46000]
> 
> FWIW I just happened to notice the same improvement, but the difference here
> is actually considerably larger (upgrade was .22 -> .26):
> 
> -Memory: 243016k available (2096k kernel code, 760k data, 96k init) [fffff80000000000,0000000017f40000]
> +Memory: 248928k available (2128k kernel code, 800k data, 120k init) [fffff80000000000,0000000017f40000]
> 
> Dave could really start charging for these hardware upgrades :)

Oh, this is starting to be really fun to upgrade... a v240 said:

-Memory: 2058624k available (2288k kernel code, 840k data, 176k init) [fffff80000000000,000000103fedc000]
+Memory: 2070608k available (2344k kernel code, 880k data, 192k init) [fffff80000000000,000000103fedc000]

-- 
     2. That which causes joy or happiness.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe sparclinux" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [DCCP]     [Linux ARM Development]     [Linux]     [Photo]     [Yosemite Help]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux x86_64]     [Linux Hams]

  Powered by Linux