From: Scott Wood <scottwood@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 16:35:02 -0500 > David Miller wrote: > > If you guys created this format in your compressed openfirmware > > trees, is it possible for you to "fix" it to match what Sparc > > systems following the proper bindings do? > > Possibly, though it'll cause some pain when old trees are used with a > kernel that expects the new binding. > > You mentioned having an actual binding document for I2C on Open > Firmware; is it available online anywhere? It's a Sun internal document I got from a Sun employee, I'll ask if there is a way I can at least share it with you privately so you can use it as a reference. > > Don't PowerMACs and such have I2C controllers and devices? > > How do they encode these I2C client device reg properties? > > As far as I can tell from poking around > http://penguinppc.org/historical/dev-trees-html/, they don't include reg > at all for i2c clients. That actually simplifies things for us, thanks for checking. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe sparclinux" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
