On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 01:10:21AM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote: > >... > > This was not something easy shareable anyway. > > And you are in no hurry - I do not expect David to look at > > this until mid/late of the week (I gues hes has a bit > > queued up to finish first when he gets home). > >... > > Finally got around to start working on this. > > A first batch of unification patches based on your patches is coming, > any comments on them are appreciated. I decided to join asi.h together in my patchset - so these are dropped. And then I cannot find my way around "make headers_check" when I split up the files in _32 and _64 because we do so for a limited set of files and not all of them. So if I do not come up with anything clever I will most likely just join them together too but with proper ifdef guards around them. The problem is that I need to do: #ifndef _ASM_SPARC_OPENPROM_H #define _ASM_SPARC_OPENPROM_H #if defined(__sparc__) && defined(__arch64__) #include <asm-sparc/openprom_64.h> #else #include <asm/openprom_32.h> #endif #endif This works well for the build case. But headers_check complain that it cannot find <asm-sparc/openprom_64.h> becuase we copy all files to asm/ and not asm-sparc/ when we export for sparc. And it needs to be "<asm-sparc/" because "<asm/" points to the wrong directory when we build sparc64. One way around it would be to drop asm-sparc64/ entirely and do the _32, _64 trick for all files that differ. But I do not have time to do so and I'm not sure David approves it. Sam -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe sparclinux" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
