On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 07:40:25PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > And I have to say, I really hate that > > ret = arch_ptrace(child, request, addr, data); > if (ret == -ENOSYS && !forced_successful_syscall_return()) > ret = ptrace_request(child, request, addr, data); > > thing. Instead of doing it that ugly way (return value and a special > per-arch forced_successful_syscall_return() thing), this really smells > like you just want to change the calling conventions for "arch_ptrace()" > instead. > > Wouldn't it be nicer to just let "arch_ptrace()" return a flag saying > whether it handled things or not? I think the easiest and cleanest would be to just drop this whole series. There's no inherent advantage of ret = -ENOSYS; in the arch_ptrace default case over ret = ptrace_request(...); -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe sparclinux" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
