On Thu, 14 Feb 2008 14:58:22 -0600 Becky Bruce <becky.bruce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Feb 13, 2008, at 7:09 PM, David Miller wrote: > > > > > I've taken into consideration the various feedback, and > > ported the bug fix and other LMB patches posted recently > > in an effort to keep the patch churn by others down wrt. > > my moving of these files. > > > > 1) Use HAVE_LMB as suggested by Sam. > > > > 2) Fix potential build errors wrt. asm/prom.h dependencies. > > > > My algorithm was: > > > > a) If the file only included asm/lmb.h I added an include > > of both linux/lmb.c and asm/prom.h > > > > b) If the file already includes asm/prom.h, I merely > > changed the asm/lmb.h to linux/lmb.h > > > > Header include mimimizations can be done as followon patches. > > > > 3) Integrate Kumar Gala's initial region fix. > > > > 4) Integrate Becky Bruce's large physical addressing change, > > but using u64 instead of phys_addr_t. > > > > It's all at: > > > > master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/lmb-2.6.git > > > > like before. > > > Thanks for picking up the patches from Kumar and myself and fitting > them into your series - this is much appreciated. FYI, I applied the > entire patch series to my local tree and test-booted both mpc8641 and > mpc8568mds and both build and boot cleanly. I also built pasemi and > ebony, those build cleanly as well. I plan on actually testing this on Ebony, Walnut, and Bamboo either later tonight or tomorrow. I don't expect many issues. Dave, those above boards would cover the build of PowerPC 4xx CPU cores. Just an FYI. josh - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe sparclinux" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
