From: Kumar Gala <galak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 07:12:26 -0600 > Does sparc have the concept of a phys_addr_t? We are in the process > of expanding the lmb support to deal with 36-bit physical addresses on > 32-bit machines. On sparc64, where I intend to use this, unsigned long's are 64-bit. If you use some phys_addr_t type instead to help ppc32 along, that would be perfectly fine with me. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe sparclinux" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
