* David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx> > Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 23:56:31 +0100 > > > is this anything the core lockdep code could help improve? Let us know > > if any aspect is hindering you. > > No, it's a sparc64 issue. > > Another problem I ran into are the huge static table sizes lockdep > uses. They really need to be either made smaller or dynamically > allocated. Andi has submitted patches for that. > Sparc64 has hard limitations on kernel size (due to firmware and > bootloader issues) and I hit these limits if I am not careful on SMP > with lockdep enabled. > > Andi Kleen and I discussed in a thread several weeks ago. I believe > Andi even came up with a suggested direction to fix this. yeah, i'll pick them up, probably tomorrow. Ingo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe sparclinux" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html