Re: Why/when use 0x10 and 0x90 for system calls?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Dec 11 2007 16:47, Javier Barrio wrote:
>
>Oh, I think I got it:
>
>ta 0x10 seems to actually become in 
>
>trap always HV_FAST_TRAP + 0x10 = ta 0x80+0x10 = ta 0x90
>
>The same applies for 'ta 0x8' for Solaris binary emulation:
>
>0x8 + 0x80 = 0x88
>
>It seems the OS/compiler is smart enough to understand both 0x90 and
>0x10 while strace is not.

If so, you should find '... & 0x80' or similar in the kernel source
and a lack there of in strace :)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe sparclinux" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [DCCP]     [Linux ARM Development]     [Linux]     [Photo]     [Yosemite Help]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux x86_64]     [Linux Hams]

  Powered by Linux