David Miller wrote: > > The big issue you keep missing in all of your rediculious complaints > is that it takes a lot of time for a company to invest in future > potential revenue. > > Most of Sun's resources are invested in things that make them money > right now and keep the lights on at their buildings and their employee > salaries paid. > Sorry David; got to disgree with you on this one. A few developers are irrelevant when considered against the potential reward. That was $13.873 _billion_, with a B. the A few good men like yourself wouldn't even effect the second decimal point... > > And _NO_ this does mean continuing to say that Sun isn't doing enough > to satisfy you, that discourages rather than encourages in case you > haven't gotten that message LOUD and CLEAR by now. > On the contrary, as an existing and prospective customer, I shall KEEP telling Sun, LOUDLY and PUBLICLY exactly what I want from them. Although not here; I have ruffled enough feathers already! BTW Isn't it somewhat ironic that the only person who seems to (somewhat) agree with me is the guy from Sun? :) Sheath your blade young sir; I shall trouble you no more... [Although, if you could just get the sparc64 kernel compiling properly with gcc4.2+ when you get a minute...] ;) Andrew Walrond - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe sparclinux" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
